The Linda Martin Award - Softballer of the Year 
The Linda Martin Award is the highest attainable club perpetual award in the A grade. This awarded is predominantly based on game performance and is given to that A-Grade player that has been deemed to have made the most impact on the results of games throughout that current season. 
The recipient has been seen to have made the most significant contribution on the diamond toward the team finishing in the final standing in which they did. 

The A-Grade coaching staff determines the recipient, based on the above criteria, by whatever method they select at the outset of the season. 

The Don Martin Award - Best Club Person

The Don Martin Award is in recognition of the best club person for that current season. The best club person is one that:

• Has acted above and beyond the call of duty on behalf of the Walkerville Softball Club
• Has represented the club in a professional and responsible manner
• Has portrayed the WSC as a proficient and community minded orgainisation
• Has promoted the development and success of both the club and its members (playing and non playing)
• Has acted with the club's best interests at heart
• Is not necessarily a player of committee member

The Debbie Hurst Perpetual Cup- B Grade MVP

Established season 2005-2006.  The recipient of the Debbie Hurst Perpetual Cup is considered to be the most valuable 
team player in the B Grade.  The selection process considers game and training performance, participation, attendance, and attitude throughout 
the year.  The coaching staff of the B Grade determines the recipient, based on the above criteria, by whatever method they select at the outset of the season.   This award need not be given should the coaching staff believe that no player adequately falls within the above criteria. 

The Cheryl Ryan Perpetual Cup- The Most Enthusiastic Player in the Third Team

The recipient of the Cheryl Ryan Perpetual Trophy (Formally known as the John Treleaven Perpetual Cup) played in the third senior grade during that current season and is considered the most enthusiastic person within that team. The selection process considers game and training performance, participation, attendance and, most importantly, attitude throughout the year.  The coaching staff of the third senior team determines the recipient, based on the above criteria, by whatever method they select at the outset of the season.   
This award need not be given should the coaching staff believe that no player adequately falls within the above criteria.

Most Worthy Player in the Lowest Grade

The recipient of this award has played in the lowest senior grade during that current season and is considered the most 
worthy player within that team. The selection process of the Most Worthy Player award considers game and training performance, participation and 
attendance.  It also takes into account the recipient’s approach toward the team and the game.  The coaching staff of the lowest senior team determines the recipient, based on the above criteria, by whatever method they select at the outset of the season.   
This award need not be given should the coaching staff believe that no player adequately falls within the above criteria. 

The Most Improved Club Player

This award is presented to that senior player who has been seen to have made the most significant improvement in their own personal playing ability over all other senior players in the club in that current season. The selection criteria of this award is predominantly based on playing skills (in all aspects of the game) including physical and mental skills.  Additionally, the recipient’s attitude and approach to the team and game is taken into 
account. The Most Improved Club Player is selected by nominations being requested from all the senior coaches.  Each coach is permitted to nominate as many players as they see fit or if they do not believe anyone has met the above criteria, no names need to be provided  The name of the player with the most nominations is circulated as the potential winner to all those coaches that submitted nominations.  At this point the coaches have the opportunity to accept or reject the nominee.  If any of the coaches reject a group discussion with then take place in order to come to a conclusion.