View ladder
2025 - 2026 Junior Summer Competition · Youth Boys
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. MC Blue Youth Boys U16 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 160 | 42 | 118 | 32 | 97% |
| 2. DVE Aquatic | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 115 | 50 | 65 | 32 | 89% |
| 3. MC Gold Youth Boys U16 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 119 | 52 | 67 | 25 | 76% |
| 4. Richmond Yellow 16sB | 12 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 105 | 79 | 26 | 26 | 72% |
| 5. MC U16 White Team | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 112 | 101 | 11 | 25 | 69% |
| 6. Richmond Black 16sB | 13 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 92 | 90 | 2 | 25 | 64% |
| 7. Northcote Youth Boys | 13 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 84 | 128 | -44 | 19 | 49% |
| 8. Monash Penguins | 13 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 29 | 170 | -141 | 14 | 36% |
| 9. Richmond Tigers 16sB | 13 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 33 | 137 | -104 | 11 | 28% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.