Ladders
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | BYEs | For | Against | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Hawks White Women | 18 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 192 | 40 | 74 | 88% |
| 2. Giants Women | 18 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 164 | 49 | 70 | 83% |
| 3. Newcomb | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 98 | 78 | 50 | 60% |
| 4. Western Vipers | 18 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 82 | 85 | 46 | 55% |
| 5. Hawks Blue Women | 18 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 67 | 143 | 38 | 45% |
| 6. Melton Padres Women | 18 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 32 | 149 | 32 | 38% |
| 7. Hobson's Bay Pirates Women | 18 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 48 | 139 | 26 | 31% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
We Support
