Standard ladder

Rylan Johnstone Huxley Hammacott Van Hammacott Luca Sachlikidis Tyler Jorgensen Kyan Biasi
Rylan Johnstone
Rylan Johnstone won!
3 — 0
Rylan Johnstone won!
0 — 3
Rylan Johnstone won!
0 — 3
Rylan Johnstone won!
3 — 0
Rylan Johnstone won!
0 — 3
Huxley Hammacott
Rylan Johnstone won!
3 — 0
Van Hammacott won!
0 — 3
Luca Sachlikidis won!
0 — 3
Tyler Jorgensen won!
0 — 3
Kyan Biasi won!
3 — 0
Van Hammacott
Rylan Johnstone won!
0 — 3
Van Hammacott won!
0 — 3
Luca Sachlikidis won!
0 — 3
Van Hammacott won!
2 — 3
Van Hammacott won!
3 — 0
Luca Sachlikidis
Rylan Johnstone won!
0 — 3
Luca Sachlikidis won!
0 — 3
Luca Sachlikidis won!
0 — 3
Tyler Jorgensen won!
2 — 3
Luca Sachlikidis won!
0 — 3
Tyler Jorgensen
Rylan Johnstone won!
3 — 0
Tyler Jorgensen won!
0 — 3
Van Hammacott won!
2 — 3
Tyler Jorgensen won!
2 — 3
Tyler Jorgensen won!
3 — 0
Kyan Biasi
Rylan Johnstone won!
0 — 3
Kyan Biasi won!
3 — 0
Van Hammacott won!
3 — 0
Luca Sachlikidis won!
0 — 3
Tyler Jorgensen won!
3 — 0

2026 Ingham Junior Squash Tournament Silver · Boys Division 3

Team Played Wins Draws Losses Forfeits For Against Diff. Points WR*1
1. Rylan Johnstone 5 5 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 0%
2. Luca Sachlikidis 5 3 0 2 0 11 6 5 0 0%
3. Tyler Jorgensen 5 3 0 2 0 11 8 3 0 0%
4. Van Hammacott 5 3 0 2 0 9 8 1 0 0%
5. Kyan Biasi 5 1 0 4 0 3 12 -9 0 0%
6. Huxley Hammacott 5 0 0 5 0 0 15 -15 0 0%
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if teams do not play an equal number of games.