Ladders
| Team | Played | Wins | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Stevens-Wagner | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 67% |
| 2. Strong-Duivenvoorden | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 67% |
| 3. Doughty-Pilz | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 8 | 67% |
| 4. Tooronga Zoo | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 33% |
| 5. Haughton (M)-Newfield | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 | 33% |
| 6. Qin-Cosgriff | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 | 33% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Partners
We Support
